RJP Group Ltd https://www.rjp-group.com/ We Turn Ambition Into Execution — and Execution Into Results. Fri, 23 May 2025 20:38:24 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.1 https://www.rjp-group.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/cropped-RJP-Logo-2025-32x32.png RJP Group Ltd https://www.rjp-group.com/ 32 32 Sales Ops Isn’t Sexy – But It Might Save Your Sales Team https://www.rjp-group.com/2025/05/19/sales-ops-isnt-sexy-but-it-might-save-your-sales-team/ https://www.rjp-group.com/2025/05/19/sales-ops-isnt-sexy-but-it-might-save-your-sales-team/#respond Mon, 19 May 2025 20:05:57 +0000 https://www.rjp-group.com/?p=6535 RJP Group - Sales Ops Isn’t Sexy – But It Might Save Your Sales Team

The post Sales Ops Isn’t Sexy – But It Might Save Your Sales Team appeared first on RJP Group Ltd.

]]>
RJP Group - Sales Ops Isn’t Sexy – But It Might Save Your Sales Team

Sales operations doesn’t grab headlines.
It doesn’t get invited to pitch. It doesn’t close deals. 

But here’s the truth:
If your sales team is struggling—it’s probably not a motivation issue.
It’s an ops issue. 

At RJP Consulting, we’ve seen this play out in every kind of sales environment—SaaS, B2B services, telecoms, real estate. You’ve got good people, decent leads, solid propositions.
Still… targets are missed. Forecasts are off. Chaos reigns. 

It’s not the team. It’s the engine.

🧩 The Hidden Complexity of Modern Sales

Sales today isn’t one conversation.
It’s a chain of systems, handovers, data points, and touchpoints—none of which work if ops is broken.

The usual symptoms: 

  • Forecasts based on fantasy
  • Reps wasting time chasing internal approvals
  • Multiple versions of pricing or product documentation
  • CRM as an admin burden, not a decision tool
  • Bottlenecks between sales and delivery or finance

And behind all of that?
No real sales operations discipline.

🚫 What Sales Ops Isn’t

It’s not just pipeline hygiene.
It’s not a spreadsheet refresh.
It’s not shouting “update Salesforce” every Friday.

Sales ops is the engine room that allows good people to close well-qualified, well-priced deals with repeatable process—and accountability.

🔍 What’s Really Going Wrong?

  • 1. No shared definition of the sales process

    • Where does marketing end and sales begin? Who qualifies what? When does delivery get involved? If the answer depends on the rep, the region, or the day of the week—it’s broken.
  • 2. Poor quote-to-cash structure

    • Reps need to be able to configure, price, quote, and close without hunting down someone in finance or product every time. That’s where CPQ (configure–price–quote) tools and workflows matter.
  • 3. No forecasting discipline

    • If forecasts are opinion-based or last-minute, you’re guessing. Good sales ops enables forecast accuracy with clear definitions, deal stages, and accountability.
    • According to HubSpot, only 28% of sales professionals say their forecasting is accurate—and just 17% say their CRM is “highly effective.”
  • 4. Sales enablement gets buried

    • No one owns onboarding. Playbooks are out of date. The deck changes weekly. And new hires burn months just figuring out how to get paid.
  • 5. Fragmented systems

    • CRM doesn’t speak to finance. Pipeline lives in PowerPoint. No single view of the customer or the commercial funnel.
  • 6. Weak funnel curation and lead management

    • Sales teams chase poor-quality leads while high-potential ones sit idle. There’s no triage, no prioritisation, and no structured allocation model based on deal size, segment, or conversion potential.
  • 7. Delivery handover and contract fulfilment breakdowns

    • Even when deals are won, execution falters. Contracts aren’t followed up quickly, invoicing lags, services aren’t provisioned properly, and customer expectations go unmet.

🛠 What Good Sales Ops Looks Like

  • Process definition and automation

    • – Clear sales stages
    • – CPQ tools or structured quote workflows
    • – Approvals streamlined or automated
  • Real forecasting discipline

    • – Weekly or biweekly forecast cadence
    • – Shared deal definitions
    • – Pipeline scrub + accountability rituals
  • Enablement that sticks

    • – Central resource hub
      – Standard onboarding sequence
      – Updated playbooks and objection handling
  • Metrics that matter

    • – Win rate
      – Sales cycle length
      – Time-to-ramp
      – Quote-to-cash velocity
      – Revenue per head
  • Commercial and delivery alignment

    • – Fast contract generation and approval flows
    • – Seamless provisioning or fulfilment process
    • – Sales-to-service handovers that don’t drop the ball
  • Lead triage and intelligent assignment

    • – Central funnel oversight
    • – Clear routing based on geography, vertical, or potential
    • – Rules of engagement to stop channel conflict

And crucially—those metrics are tracked consistently and drive coaching, not punishment.
“A good sales team with bad operations will lose to a mediocre team with great ops—every time.”

(Seen it. Fixed it.) 

🧰 Tools and Tech That Help—or Hurt

Sales ops lives and dies by systems. Some of the most common tools:

Salesforce – The most customisable, but also the most often abused. Without strong governance and clear reporting hierarchies, it turns into a data swamp.

HubSpot – Easier out-of-the-box, especially for marketing–sales alignment. But it lacks deep enterprise customisation.

Zoho / Pipedrive / Freshsales – Lower-cost and lighter weight. Great for simpler models or early-stage businesses, but can hit limits with scale or integrations.

CPQ Tools (e.g. Conga, DealHub, Salesforce CPQ) – Crucial for teams with complex pricing or bundling. Saves time, avoids mistakes, and builds confidence in the quote process.

Sales Enablement Platforms (e.g. Highspot, Showpad) – Keep content up to date and push new messaging to the frontline. Underused but powerful.

The key isn’t the tool—it’s the design and discipline behind it.

 

💬 A Word on Sales vs Sales Ops

They’re not the same.

Sales teams are responsible for results.
Sales ops is responsible for rhythm, clarity, and structure that makes those results possible at scale.

You don’t fix missed targets by yelling louder or hiring more reps.
You fix the foundation.


🚀 How RJP Consulting Helps

We work with commercial leaders to:

  • Map and optimise the end-to-end sales process
  • Implement scalable forecasting, CPQ, and CRM models
  • Design enablement programs that actually land
  • Align sales, delivery, and finance into one operating model
  • Build metrics that matter—then help manage to them
  • Rationalise tools and rebuild tech stack governance

 

Final Thought

Sales ops isn’t shiny. It won’t wow the boardroom.
But it’s probably the thing standing between your business and consistent, profitable growth.
📩 If your pipeline feels messy and your revenue machine inconsistent—

The post Sales Ops Isn’t Sexy – But It Might Save Your Sales Team appeared first on RJP Group Ltd.

]]>
https://www.rjp-group.com/2025/05/19/sales-ops-isnt-sexy-but-it-might-save-your-sales-team/feed/ 0
Profit vs Growth: The Trade-Off Too Many SMEs Ignore https://www.rjp-group.com/2025/05/12/profit-vs-growth-the-trade-off-too-many-smes-ignore/ https://www.rjp-group.com/2025/05/12/profit-vs-growth-the-trade-off-too-many-smes-ignore/#respond Mon, 12 May 2025 23:11:45 +0000 https://www.rjp-group.com/?p=6509 Why Most 3-Year Business Plans Are Useless (And What To Do Instead) 

The post Profit vs Growth: The Trade-Off Too Many SMEs Ignore appeared first on RJP Group Ltd.

]]>
RJP Group - Profit vs Growth - The Trade-Off Too Many SMEs Ignore

Most SMEs talk about growth.
More customers. More revenue. Bigger markets. 

But here’s the catch:
Growth isn’t free. And it often comes at the cost of profit. 

At RJP Consulting, we’ve worked with dozens of businesses chasing topline targets—only to realise too late that their margins have collapsed or cash flow is strained. 

So let’s talk about the trade-off that’s hiding in plain sight: 

The tension between growing fast and staying profitable. 

According to the UK Department for Business and Trade, SMEs account for 99.9% of the UK business population, employing over 60% of the workforce—but they also represent the majority of business failures each year, with poor financial planning cited as a leading cause. 

 

📈 Growth Feels Good… Until It Doesn’t 

Everyone loves a hockey-stick chart.
But beneath the curve, most growth stories hide things like: 

  • Discounting to win volume 
  • Extra hires to deliver inconsistent demand 
  • Complicated onboarding or delivery cycles 
  • Higher debt loads to fund expansion 

And that all chews into margin. 

According to a Xero SME Benchmarking report, over 60% of small businesses that scaled quickly saw a drop in net profit in the first 18 months. Worse—many couldn’t recover. 

Because growth without margin = cash burn.
And SMEs don’t have the capital buffer that big corporates do. 

 

🧮 The False Logic of “We’ll Make It Up Later” 

We often hear this:
“Let’s focus on revenue now—profit will come when we hit scale.” 

Sometimes that’s true.
But most SMEs never hit the scale they imagined. 

  • CAC (customer acquisition cost) doesn’t fall fast enough 
  • Churn offsets growth 
  • Complexity grows faster than income 
  • Teams are firefighting, not building efficiency 

You can’t bank on “eventual scale” unless you’ve proven you can get there with margin intact. 

 

🔍 So Why Do Businesses Chase Growth Over Profit? 

Three big reasons: 

  1. Vanity metrics – Revenue feels good. It attracts investors, headlines, and award entries. But margin is harder to celebrate. 
  1. Sales-led culture – The loudest voices push for targets, and few challenge the commercial logic. 
  1. Misaligned incentives – Bonuses and KPIs often reward topline performance—not sustainable profit or delivery cost. 

Add a board that wants “aggressive growth,” and the pressure builds fast. 

 

⚖ You Need a Clear Growth Thesis 

We always ask clients: 

  • Why grow now? 
  • What will it cost us to grow? 
  • Where is that growth actually coming from—new markets, new products, or deeper share of existing ones? 
  • Are there real economies of scale to be had—or are we just adding complexity? 
  • Can any part of that growth be automated or made scalable through technology? 
  • Do we know where the margin really is in our portfolio? 
  • Are our internal processes ready to handle more customers? 
  • Are we growing outside our core competency? 
  • What are competitors doing—are they coming after our space? 
  • Do we have the cash to support growth that doesn’t convert to profit immediately? 

If the answers are vague—you’re gambling, not planning. 

 

🛠 What You Should Be Doing 

✅ Know your true unit economics 

Get forensic about: 

  • Margin by product/service 
  • Cost to serve each customer segment 
  • Discounting behaviour 
  • Operational load created by growth 

✅ Stress-test your delivery model 

Growth usually means: 

  • More onboarding 
  • More support tickets 
  • More service variability 

If your ops team is already stretched, growth will expose the cracks. 

✅ Align incentives with sustainable performance 

Rewire targets to reward profitable growth—not just activity. 

  • Reward margin retention, not just revenue 
  • Link bonuses to customer lifetime value 
  • Build shared KPIs between sales and delivery teams 

✅ Make space for profit-led decision-making 

Some customers aren’t worth winning.
Some products shouldn’t scale.
You may need to slow down to fix underlying cost models before ramping back up. 

“Revenue is vanity. Profit is sanity. Cash is reality.”
(Old CFO saying that still hits hard in 2025.) 

 

🚀 How RJP Consulting Helps 

We support SMEs to: 

  • Model the real trade-offs between growth and profit 
  • Rationalise portfolios to focus on high-margin offers 
  • Align go-to-market and operations to reduce delivery drag 
  • Build growth plans grounded in financial sustainability—not fantasy 
  • Restructure incentives to prioritise margin, not just movement 

 

Final Thought 

Growth is exciting.
But profit pays the wages. 

If you’re chasing volume without understanding the cost—you’re not scaling.
You’re leaking. 

📩 Want to pressure-test your growth strategy before it burns margin?

The post Profit vs Growth: The Trade-Off Too Many SMEs Ignore appeared first on RJP Group Ltd.

]]>
https://www.rjp-group.com/2025/05/12/profit-vs-growth-the-trade-off-too-many-smes-ignore/feed/ 0
Where to Play and How to Win: Rethinking Strategic Focus in an Unstable Market https://www.rjp-group.com/2025/05/09/where-to-play-and-how-to-win-rethinking-strategic-focus-in-an-unstable-market/ https://www.rjp-group.com/2025/05/09/where-to-play-and-how-to-win-rethinking-strategic-focus-in-an-unstable-market/#respond Fri, 09 May 2025 20:27:57 +0000 https://www.rjp-group.com/?p=6499 Why Most 3-Year Business Plans Are Useless (And What To Do Instead) 

The post Where to Play and How to Win: Rethinking Strategic Focus in an Unstable Market appeared first on RJP Group Ltd.

]]>
RJP-Group - Rethinking Strategic Focus in an Unstable Market

For years, strategy meant locking into a market, building share, and scaling.
Pick a segment. Build a moat. Defend your turf. 

That model’s breaking down. 

Now?
The ground shifts faster than most leadership teams can update their slide decks. 

At RJP Consulting, we’re seeing a fundamental shift: growth no longer depends just on where you play—but also on how fast you can adapt when that playing field changes. 

 

🌍 The Old Rules Don’t Hold 

The traditional approach looked something like this: 

  1. Identify your core market 
  2. Build a portfolio around it 
  3. Optimise the model 
  4. Extract value over time 

But in today’s climate—defined by geopolitical volatility, AI-driven disruption, rising costs, and buyer fatigue—static focus becomes fragility. 

Markets evolve faster than most organisations can execute. 

According to a 2024 BCG report, over 60% of business leaders say their core market assumptions have changed in the past 18 months. Yet only 1 in 4 have meaningfully adjusted their strategic plans. 

The danger? Treating volatility as temporary—when it may be the new baseline. 

 

⚠ The Strategic Risks We See Weekly 

  • Companies over-invested in declining customer segments 
  • Products still aimed at problems that no longer exist 
  • Sales teams targeting too many verticals with unclear positioning 
  • Ops stretched across multiple delivery models that no longer scale 
  • Boards sticking to 3-year plans written for markets that have already moved on 

In uncertain markets, complexity isn’t a hedge—it’s a cost. Strategic indecision becomes operational drag. 

 

🔍 Focus Doesn’t Mean Narrow 

When we talk about “where to play,” we’re not just talking about geography or industry.
Strategic focus means clarity on: 

  • The customer problem you’re solving 
  • The buyer type you’re targeting 
  • The delivery model you’re resourced to execute 
  • The value chain position you can defend and scale 

And critically—what is your core competency?
Are you operating in areas that play to your strengths, or drifting into offers and markets that dilute what you do best? 

If your strategy isn’t anchored in your competitive advantage, your execution will suffer. 

Many businesses confuse opportunity with strategy. Just because a market is growing doesn’t mean you should be there. 

Strategy is about fit—not just size. 

 

📉 What Happens Without Focus 

  • Bloated portfolios with no clear core 
  • Sales collateral that tries to speak to everyone—and connects with no one 
  • Teams constantly pivoting between priorities 
  • Leadership wasting time “chasing tail” rather than doubling down on what works 

According to McKinsey, companies with high strategic clarity outperform peers by up to 30% in EBITDA growth over five years. Yet most leadership teams spend less than 15% of their time on strategic focus and portfolio decisions. 

It’s not just about being right. It’s about being lean enough to move quickly. 

Look at Elon Musk’s approach at Twitter (now X): he stripped out huge numbers of staff who weren’t materially contributing to profitability. Costs plummeted almost overnight. Revenues dipped slightly, but profitability surged. 

The message? You don’t need everyone—you need the right ones. 

🔎 A Harvard Business School study found that just 20% of employees typically drive 80% of a company’s value-creating output. When lean, focused teams align behind a clear strategy, agility and execution improve exponentially. 

Whether or not you agree with the tactics, the principle is clear: you can’t pivot if you’re bloated. 

 

🛠 So What Should You Do? 

✅ Pressure-test your current focus 

Ask: 

    • Is this segment still growing profitably? 
    • Are we genuinely differentiated here? 
    • Can we scale without reinventing the model? 
    • Does this align with our core competencies? 

If the answer’s “sort of” or “maybe”—you’re exposed. 

✅ Re-align resources 

Growth doesn’t come from spreading thin.
It comes from placing sharper bets with clearer execution. 

Kill zombie projects. Re-deploy capital and people to where the real opportunity lies. 

💡 Gartner found that companies who reallocated 20%+ of budget annually toward high-potential segments saw 2x the revenue growth of those who didn’t. 

✅ Be prepared to pivot 

Focus doesn’t mean rigidity.
Build optionality into your strategy—adjacent segments, modular offers, delivery flexibility. 

If the ground shifts again, you’ll want room to move. 

✅ Cut complexity and automate where possible 

Ask: 

    • Can we automate repetitive or low-value processes using AI or workflow tools? 
    • Can our sales process be standardised to avoid bespoke offers? 
    • Are our products and pricing creating unnecessary complexity across ops? 
    • Lean strategy means simplifying how you operate—not just what you offer. 

✅ Review the supply chain and channel model 

Look hard at your routes to market: 

    • Are there middlemen or channel partners adding cost without value? 
    • Could you shift to a direct-to-customer model—or consolidate partners? 
    • Are your distribution and service models aligned with how customers now want to buy? 

The best strategies don’t just focus outward. They simplify inward. 

 

🚀 How RJP Consulting Helps 

We work with leadership teams to: 

  • Run strategic focus and market fit assessments 
  • Align product, sales, and delivery models with highest-fit segments 
  • Identify segments that have outlived their value 
  • Strip out complexity and unnecessary costs from operations 
  • Develop modular execution plans that support focused scaling—with flexibility built in 
  • Automate internal processes and rationalise delivery models 

Final Thought 

“Where to play” is no longer a one-off decision. It’s a discipline—and the businesses that get it right don’t just grow.  They stay alive longer than their competitors.

📩 Want to test whether your current strategy still makes sense?

The post Where to Play and How to Win: Rethinking Strategic Focus in an Unstable Market appeared first on RJP Group Ltd.

]]>
https://www.rjp-group.com/2025/05/09/where-to-play-and-how-to-win-rethinking-strategic-focus-in-an-unstable-market/feed/ 0
Why Most Product Portfolios Are Too Fat, Too Slow, and Misaligned with the Market https://www.rjp-group.com/2025/04/28/why-most-product-portfolios-are-too-fat-too-slow-and-misaligned-with-the-market/ https://www.rjp-group.com/2025/04/28/why-most-product-portfolios-are-too-fat-too-slow-and-misaligned-with-the-market/#respond Mon, 28 Apr 2025 19:23:57 +0000 https://www.rjp-group.com/?p=6527 RJP-Group - Why Most Product Portfolios Are Too Fat, Too Slow, and Misaligned with the Market

The post Why Most Product Portfolios Are Too Fat, Too Slow, and Misaligned with the Market appeared first on RJP Group Ltd.

]]>
RJP-Group - Why Most Product Portfolios Are Too Fat, Too Slow, and Misaligned with the Market

Most companies don’t suffer from a lack of products.
They suffer from too many—and the wrong ones. 

Over time, portfolios get bloated with legacy offers, experimental add-ons, and bespoke one-offs for “strategic clients.” And instead of fuelling growth, they dilute it. 

At RJP Consulting, we’ve seen how unchecked portfolios create operational drag, confuse sales teams, and erode margin. The biggest issue? No one’s really in charge of cleaning them up. 

 

💣 The Hidden Risks of a Bloated Portfolio 

  1. Too Fat: No One’s Culling the Dead Weight

Most businesses add products far more often than they remove them.
Why? Because killing an offer feels risky—even when it’s not working. 

But let’s be clear: 

  • Products with low/no margin aren’t strategic 
  • Products that no one can operationally support are liabilities 
  • Products that don’t align with current market demand shouldn’t be there 

Still, they persist. Why? 

  • Pet projects: Product managers need to justify their existence, and admitting defeat is hard 
  • Overlapping offers: Multiple products do roughly the same thing, with minor differences and loads of internal politics attached. (Ironically, the car industry does this well—multiple models built on the same base platform.) 
  • Bespoke-for-one: A legacy deal for a “key customer” that now costs more to service than it brings in 
  • Fear of churn: Products stay live just because no one wants to rock the boat with a handful of vocal customers—even if the product doesn’t fit the current operating model 

If you can’t explain who it’s for, what problem it solves, and why now—it doesn’t belong. 

 

  1. Too Slow: Delivery Can’t Keep Up

Complex portfolios slow everything down: 

  • Sales cycles stretch while reps try to explain unclear offers 
  • Delivery teams build workarounds to fulfil odd combinations 
  • Ops teams drown in exceptions, approvals, and custom terms 

Each new product adds operational overhead. You need new processes, new training, new billing codes, new service terms. 

According to Bain & Company, companies with low portfolio complexity grow revenues up to 30% faster and earn margins up to 25% higher than their more complicated peers. 

When your product mix exceeds your ability to deliver efficiently, you’re not innovating—you’re suffocating. 

 

  1. Too Misaligned: What You Offer ≠ What the Market Needs

The market evolves. Most portfolios don’t. 

Many firms don’t stop to ask: Does our offer still solve the current problem? 

What once made sense may now be: 

  • Overpriced 
  • Over-engineered 
  • Over-reliant on customers or channels that no longer convert 
  • Misaligned with how customers want to buy today (eg. self-serve, digital, recurring) 

Or worse—it’s internally popular but externally irrelevant. The team loves it. The market doesn’t care. 

According to Deloitte, over 60% of failed product launches stem from a mismatch between product capabilities and customer needs. 

Relevance is not a static achievement. It’s a moving target. And portfolios need to be revalidated regularly. 

 

🧪 Common Portfolio Symptoms 

If any of these sound familiar, your portfolio needs work: 

  • Products with <10% of revenue still get significant internal time 
  • Sales teams avoid pitching certain products because they “don’t land” 
  • Your support teams have cheat sheets just to process orders 
  • Pricing strategies are inconsistent or overly reactive 
  • Nobody owns the roadmap for simplification 

 

🔧 What to Do About It 

✅ Run a product performance audit 

Don’t just look at revenue. Look at: 

  • Margin contribution 
  • Delivery complexity 
  • Strategic fit 
  • Market demand 
  • Sales traction 
  • Subscription cost-to-serve, even for dormant or low-usage customers 
  • Feature overlap: could an alternative be offered instead? Can another product be adapted to serve both needs? 

If the product isn’t clearly better than what else exists—or easily rationalised—it’s probably not worth keeping. 

 

✅ Segment the Portfolio 

Every product should fall into one of three categories: 

  • Core: High-margin, high-demand, low-friction. These are the money-makers that customers understand and teams can deliver with confidence. Review quarterly. 
  • Strategic: Products that serve emerging needs, future positioning, or test grounds. But they require active management, clear KPIs, and an exit plan if they don’t scale. 
  • Retire: Legacy, underperforming, or low-fit offers. Keep them too long and they’ll drag down your margins, confuse your teams, and erode focus. 

Segmenting once isn’t enough. Portfolios need active governance to stay sharp. 

 

✅ Rebuild Around Capability and Customer Value 

This is the hard bit—but it’s where competitive advantage is built. 

Ask: 

  • Can we deliver this reliably, at scale, and profitably? 
  • Does this clearly solve a valuable customer problem today? 
  • Are our best people focused on this—or is it draining attention? 
  • Is it distinct from the rest of the portfolio? Does it earn its place? 

Also consider: 

  • Could we consolidate two products into one stronger offer? 
  • Can customers be migrated to something better and shut the legacy product down? 
  • Do we have the right support model to service this without operational strain? 

Rebuilding doesn’t mean a blank slate. It means ruthless clarity about what earns a place—and what doesn’t. 

 

🚀 How RJP Consulting Helps 

We support clients to: 

  • Run portfolio audits across commercial, delivery, and operations 
  • Identify product overlaps, gaps, and misfits 
  • Remove unnecessary complexity from sales and service delivery 
  • Align go-to-market strategies with high-performing, simplified offers 
  • Rationalise SKUs and replatform overlapping products 
  • Build internal frameworks for product lifecycle management and continuous simplification 

 


Bottom Line

You don’t need more products.
You need the right ones—and fewer of them.

Because bloated portfolios don’t just slow you down.
They stop you from scaling.

📩 Ready to simplify what you sell and grow faster?

The post Why Most Product Portfolios Are Too Fat, Too Slow, and Misaligned with the Market appeared first on RJP Group Ltd.

]]>
https://www.rjp-group.com/2025/04/28/why-most-product-portfolios-are-too-fat-too-slow-and-misaligned-with-the-market/feed/ 0
Why Most Growth Problems Are Internal, Not External https://www.rjp-group.com/2025/04/15/why-most-growth-problems-are-internal-not-external/ https://www.rjp-group.com/2025/04/15/why-most-growth-problems-are-internal-not-external/#respond Tue, 15 Apr 2025 18:18:54 +0000 https://www.rjp-group.com/?p=6422 Why Most 3-Year Business Plans Are Useless (And What To Do Instead) 

The post Why Most Growth Problems Are Internal, Not External appeared first on RJP Group Ltd.

]]>
RJP - Group - Why Most Growth Problems Are Internal, Not External

Most businesses blame the market when growth stalls.

“Too much competition.”
“Prices are under pressure.”
“The economy’s slowing.”

Maybe. But more often, the problem isn’t out there. It’s internal.

At RJP Consulting, we’ve seen this play out across sectors—from fast-growth tech firms to long-established industrials. The real blockers? They’re almost always inside the walls.

 

💣 The Real Growth Killers

Here are the blind spots we see most often:

1. Unclear Accountability

You’d be surprised how many leadership teams can’t answer: “Who owns this outcome?”

Responsibilities are diluted. Projects are run by committee. No one is tracking what actually gets delivered.

According to a Harvard Business Review study, 95% of employees don’t understand their company’s strategy. That disconnect kills momentum.

Growth doesn’t stall because of a lack of strategy. It stalls because nothing gets over the line.  And before you even start delivering—have you defined what you’re delivering? What does success look like? Is everyone aligned? Or is the strategy just words in a slide deck?

2. Misaligned Incentives

If your sales team is incentivised on volume, don’t be surprised when margin erodes. If your product team is measured on features shipped, expect complexity to spiral.

Incentives aren’t just internal, either. Many firms forget to align external incentives—channel partners, resellers, or distributors often don’t have a compelling reason to push your offer.

Growth is a system. If one part’s out of sync—it drags the whole machine down.

3. Product Bloat and Poor Go-To-Market Execution

That “strategic” product line you launched five years ago? It’s now a resource drain. It barely sells. But no one’s had the nerve to kill it. Even worse—many new products are launched with no real go-to-market strategy.

Here’s what’s typically missing:

    • Pricing: Set too high to move volume, or too low to drive profit
    • Promotion: Marketing isn’t equipped with the right messaging or assets
    • Placement: No defined channel strategy; is it direct, partner, or hybrid?
    • Enablement: Sales teams don’t understand the value proposition, or where it fits in the portfolio

According to McKinsey, only 40% of product launches meet their business objectives. A poorly executed launch isn’t just a miss—it’s fuel for internal friction. And often, the issue goes back further: Was the business case robust in the first place? Was enough resource allocated to meet customer expectations? Or did a product make it to market because someone “really believed in it”?

4. No Deep Sales Analysis

We often hear: “Sales are down.” But when you dig deeper, the business hasn’t actually looked at the numbers.

    • Which segments are declining?
    • Which reps are consistently missing targets?
    • Which products are being discounted to move volume?
    • What’s the conversion rate on inbound leads vs outbound efforts?

Without clear sales performance insight, it’s guesswork—not growth strategy.

5. The Execution Gap

You’ve got a great strategy. The board signed off. You even held a town hall.

Six months later…

    • No one’s tracking delivery
    • Teams have reverted to BAU
    • Half the initiatives are stuck in “pre-scoping”

Strategy doesn’t fail at the whiteboard. It fails when no one owns the messy middle.

 

🔎 So How Do You Fix It?

✅ Step 1: Run a brutal internal diagnostic

This isn’t about pointing fingers—it’s about surfacing the friction that’s holding you back.

Ask:

    • Where are we creating drag?
    • What complexity are we tolerating?
    • What workarounds have become “normal”?

✅ Step 2: Re-align incentives and decision-making

If the KPIs are wrong, the outcomes will be too. Make sure your growth drivers are reflected in how teams are rewarded and resourced—and make sure external stakeholders are aligned, too.

✅ Step 3: Rationalise before you invest

More growth doesn’t come from more products. It comes from a sharper, cleaner offer and a business that’s easier to scale.

✅ Step 4: Make delivery visible

Put ownership in black and white. Review regularly. Celebrate progress. Kill what’s not working.

 

🚀 How We Help

At RJP Consulting, we help organisations see what’s really in their way—and fix it.

We:

  • Challenge leadership assumptions
  • Run honest internal capability and sales performance reviews
  • Remove complexity from product portfolios
  • Build go-to-market strategies that work across pricing, promotion, placement, and sales enablement
  • Develop realistic business cases that align to internal resource and market expectation
  • Build execution plans that drive action—not just meetings

 

Bottom Line

If growth has stalled, don’t start with the market. Start with the mirror.

Because most businesses don’t lose momentum from the outside. They lose it from blind spots they stopped noticing.

📩 Ready for a clearer view of what’s holding you back?

The post Why Most Growth Problems Are Internal, Not External appeared first on RJP Group Ltd.

]]>
https://www.rjp-group.com/2025/04/15/why-most-growth-problems-are-internal-not-external/feed/ 0
Why Most ERP Implementations Fail—And How to Make Yours Work https://www.rjp-group.com/2025/04/08/why-most-erp-implementations-fail-and-how-to-make-yours-work/ https://www.rjp-group.com/2025/04/08/why-most-erp-implementations-fail-and-how-to-make-yours-work/#respond Tue, 08 Apr 2025 00:00:04 +0000 https://www.rjp-group.com/?p=6350 Why Most 3-Year Business Plans Are Useless (And What To Do Instead) 

The post Why Most ERP Implementations Fail—And How to Make Yours Work appeared first on RJP Group Ltd.

]]>
RJP Group - Why Most ERP Implementations Fail—And How to Make Yours Work.

ERP isn’t just a systems project.
It’s a reckoning.

It forces you to face uncomfortable truths about your products, processes, customers—and how your business really operates. Which is exactly why so many ERP implementations go wrong, cost millions, and leave businesses with shiny systems no one uses properly.

Most ERP failures don’t come from bad software.
They come from bad assumptions.

 

ERP Failure: The Expensive, Avoidable Reality

Let’s start with the uncomfortable bit:
Most ERP projects either overspend, underdeliver, or both.

A 2023 survey by Panorama Consulting found that over 50% of ERP projects experience cost overruns, and more than a third are deemed “failures” by the organisations implementing them. ERP implementations are among the most critical and expensive initiatives a business can undertake, often ranging from hundreds of thousands to several million pounds, depending on the organisation’s size and complexity.

That’s not a technology problem—it’s a leadership one.

The common traps:

  • No clear business outcome beyond “we need a new system”
  • ERP treated like an IT upgrade instead of a business transformation
  • Process mapping done after the system is already chosen
  • Key decisions made in isolation (typically by finance or ops)
  • Internal resistance from teams clinging to manual workarounds
  • Poor change management and almost zero engagement planning
  • In short: a failure to ask the right questions before anyone touches a keyboard.

 

The Hidden Landmine: Your Products and Customers

One of the biggest truths ERP projects expose is this:

80% of your revenue probably comes from 20% (or fewer) of your products.

The rest?

  • Unprofitable custom offers kept alive to keep a single customer happy
  • Products with duplicated features, identical outcomes, or no clear commercial logic
  • Entire categories that require manual intervention to deliver

An ERP system doesn’t magically fix this. In fact, it breaks under the weight of it—unless you rationalise your portfolio and make commercial decisions about what stays, what goes, and what gets migrated.

And here’s the kicker:
Most businesses can’t even agree on what products exist.
No taxonomy, no single catalogue, just fragments of spreadsheets and “ask Dave in sales.”

ERP will force you to face this. The only question is: will you fix it, or paper over it again and hope for the best?

 

Watch Out for This Classic Trap: The Over-Servicing Consultancy

One more thing no one tells you before you start:
Some consultancies will sell you the world—and then flood your business with teams who create more confusion than clarity.

Here’s how it works:

  • A “strategy lead,” a “delivery partner,” a “change architect,” and a “process lead” all appear, each billing independently
  • Discovery work gets repeated in silos, progress slows, and the business is left wondering what anyone is actually delivering
  • You’re paying premium rates to coordinate people who were brought in to help you coordinate things

If your implementation partner isn’t simplifying complexity, challenging assumptions, and aligning stakeholders—they’re probably just padding the invoice.

 

What Good ERP Looks Like

Done right, ERP enables clarity, scale, and commercial control. But to get there, your project needs:

  • Business-led goals, not just system specs
  • Ruthless process and product cleanup before configuration begins
  • Portfolio analysis to cut, consolidate, or migrate product complexity
  • A shared product catalogue and taxonomy recognised across the business
  • Change management baked in from day one—not after go-live
  • Partners who don’t just nod along—they challenge you, pressure-test plans, and protect commercial outcomes
  • A platform choice aligned with your actual needs—whether that’s SAP, Oracle, Microsoft Dynamics, NetSuite, Salesforce, or another provider.

 

Choosing the Right ERP Platform: A Quick Snapshot

SAP is powerful for large, complex global operations—but with complexity comes high cost and implementation time. It demands robust process clarity going in.

Oracle offers strong scalability and deep financial functionality but often suits organisations with significant internal capability to manage its sophistication.

Microsoft Dynamics 365 is flexible and integrates well with Microsoft environments, making it a strong mid-market choice—but it still requires heavy configuration to match business processes.

NetSuite excels in high-growth, cloud-first businesses, particularly in services and software sectors. It’s quick to deploy but less configurable for heavily customised models.

Salesforce, traditionally CRM-first, now competes in the ERP space with its platform-based approach. It’s strong in customer-facing workflows and modular scalability but can become expensive with customisation and bolt-ons.

No system solves structural complexity. It just makes it harder to ignore.

 

How RJP Group Delivers Transformation That Works

At RJP Group, we help organisations get ERP right—because we focus on what really matters:

  • Challenging assumptions at the start, not the end
  • Aligning leadership, operations, and front-line delivery
  • Supporting product rationalisation and customer simplification as part of the plan
  • Keeping implementation teams lean, focused, and accountable
  • Never delivering for the sake of activity—only for results

 

The Bottom Line

ERP won’t fix broken products or outdated processes.
It will expose them.

Handled properly, that’s an opportunity to build something cleaner, simpler, and scalable.
Handled poorly, it’s a multi-million pound systems distraction that creates more mess than it solves.

If you’re thinking about ERP, start by asking the tough questions.
We’ll help you get the right answers—and deliver transformation that sticks.

 

📩 Let’s talk. RJP Group supports ERP-led business transformation with commercial clarity, cross-functional delivery, and no theatre.

The post Why Most ERP Implementations Fail—And How to Make Yours Work appeared first on RJP Group Ltd.

]]>
https://www.rjp-group.com/2025/04/08/why-most-erp-implementations-fail-and-how-to-make-yours-work/feed/ 0
Why Most 3-Year Business Plans Are Useless (And What To Do Instead) https://www.rjp-group.com/2025/04/01/why-most-3-year-business-plans-are-useless-and-what-to-do-instead/ https://www.rjp-group.com/2025/04/01/why-most-3-year-business-plans-are-useless-and-what-to-do-instead/#respond Tue, 01 Apr 2025 17:45:28 +0000 https://www.rjp-group.com/?p=6328 Why Most 3-Year Business Plans Are Useless (And What To Do Instead) 

The post Why Most 3-Year Business Plans Are Useless (And What To Do Instead) appeared first on RJP Group Ltd.

]]>

Let’s be honest—how many “strategic plans” end up in a drawer, gathering dust until someone remembers to update the date on the cover? 

Too many businesses spend weeks (or months) putting together 50-slide PowerPoints that look great in the boardroom but have zero impact on the day-to-day. It’s a well-meaning ritual—but strategy isn’t about rituals. It’s about action. 

So, why do most 3-year plans fail? 

  1. They’re built for the board, not the business.
    Overly polished, filled with buzzwords, and designed to impress—these plans are more about optics than outcomes. But if your ops team can’t translate it into what they’re doing next week, it’s already broken.
  2. They assume the world won’t change.
    Three years is a lifetime in today’s market. If your plan can’t flex with market shifts, new competitors, or internal surprises, it’s not a strategy—it’s a fantasy.
  3. They skip the hard groundwork.
    Many strategies fail because they start with “where we want to go” instead of “what we’re actually good at” and “what the market needs.” Without proper market analysis and a clear-eyed view of core capabilities, you’re just guessing with a glossy finish.
  4. They don’t ask the tough questions.
    • Is this strategy actually achievable with the resources we have? 
    • What level of investment does it need—and can we fund it? 
    • Do we have buy-in from the people who’ll be expected to deliver it? 
    • What market conditions is it based on—and what’s our plan if they shift? 

Most strategies assume best-case scenarios, but the best strategies plan for reality—which often includes friction, delays, resistance, and curveballs. 

What to do instead?

Here’s a better way to think about strategy:
✅ Start with a brutal truth session.
What’s really working? What’s dragging you down? Where are the blind spots? Be honest—because growth built on delusion won’t last. 
✅ Map your market—properly.
This means more than a SWOT. Understand your competitors, shifts in buyer behaviour, tech disruption, and your positioning in the ecosystem. This isn’t a “nice to have”—it’s your foundation. 
✅ Know your edge.
Every business has core competencies—but many can’t articulate them clearly. What do you do better than anyone else? Where’s your operational leverage? A good strategy doubles down on this; a bad one ignores it entirely. 
✅ Stress-test your strategy.
Ask the uncomfortable questions. What could derail this? What assumptions are baked in? Where are the dependencies, and what happens if they fall over? If your strategy doesn’t survive scrutiny, it won’t survive execution. 
✅ Set a direction, not a fixed destination.
You need a North Star, but not a GPS route with every turn mapped. Build in flexibility and tolerance for change—because forecasts are guesses, and even good guesses go sideways. 
✅ Tie everything to action.
Every strategic objective should have clear ownership, real deadlines, and practical impact. No fluff. No vagueness. 
✅ Review quarterly, not annually.
A “set and forget” strategy is a liability. The most successful businesses treat their plan as a living, breathing playbook—one that evolves with them. 

The bottom line?

You don’t need a 3-year plan.
You need a 3-year direction grounded in reality—and a 3-month execution cycle that keeps it moving. 

That’s how you build strategy that actually works
✔ Built on real data
✔ Stress-tested for feasibility
✔ Flexible enough to adapt
✔ And bought into by the people who matter 


Need a strategy that survives more than the boardroom?

Let’s talk. We help businesses build smart, grounded plans that turn insight into momentum. 

The post Why Most 3-Year Business Plans Are Useless (And What To Do Instead) appeared first on RJP Group Ltd.

]]>
https://www.rjp-group.com/2025/04/01/why-most-3-year-business-plans-are-useless-and-what-to-do-instead/feed/ 0